Data Collector Clustering Woes


During the last few days I’ve been struggling to work around something that seems to be a bug in SQL Server 2008 R2 Data Collector in a clustered environment. It’s been quite a struggle, so I decided to post my findings and my resolution, hoping I didn’t contend in vain.

SYMPTOMS:

After setting up a Utility Control Point, I started to enroll my instances to the UCP and everything was looking fine.

UCP1

When an instance is enrolled to a UCP, the sysutility_mdw database can be used as a target Management Datawarehouse for non-utility collection sets, such as the built-in system collection sets. Actually, the utility database is the only possible target for any collection set, since the data collection configuration is shared between utility and non-utility collection sets.

That said, I enabled and started the system collection sets and eagerly waited for some data to show up on the built-in reports. As nothing turned up, I checked the data collector jobs and they were executing successfully, so the data had to be there, hidden somewhere.

In fact, the data had been collected and uploaded successfully, but it didn’t show up in the reports because of the way the data source had been registered in the Management Datawarehouse internal tables.

A quick look at [core].[source_info_internal] unveiled the root cause of the issue: the clustered instances had been registered with the physical name of the cluster node and not with the virtual server name of the instance.

UCP2

The built-in Data Collector reports filter data in this table using the server name connected in SSMS, which is obviously very different from what found in the data sources table. For instance, when connected to the clustered instance VIRTUAL1\INST01, I didn’t see any performance data showing in the report because the data had been collected using the physical network name of the owner node (eg. PHYSICAL1\INST01).

I know it may sound confusing at this point, so keep the following picture in mind while looking at servers and instances in the example.

UCP3

So, what was wrong with my setup? How could it be fixed?

I tried everything that came to my mind to no avail. In order, I tried:

  • Wiping out the datawarehouse database (sysutility_mdw)
  • Reinstalling the instance hosting the datawarehouse
  • Changing the upload jobs (this one looked promising, because some job steps contained the $(MACH)\$(INST) tokens instead of the $(SRVR) token I would have expected, but it didn’t work either)
  • Updating data in the tables directly

Nothing I tried solved the issue: every time the upload jobs ran at the enrolled instances, the wrong instance names turned up in the data sources table.

I suspect something was wrong in the Management Datawarehouse instance, since the same issue affected all the enrolled instances, no matter where they were installed. Question is I was unable to find a way to make it work.

The only thing that worked for me was forcing SQL Server to understand what my cluster setup looks like and preventing it from using cluster node names instead of virtual instance names.

As ugly as it can be, the only fix that worked was a view + INSTEAD OF TRIGGER combination.

First of all we need some tables to store the cluster layout, with nodes and instances.

-- Create a couple of tables in msdb to
-- describe the cluster topology
USE msdb;
GO

CREATE TABLE sysutility_ucp_managed_cluster_nodes (
    cluster_id int NOT NULL,
    node_name sysname NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
)
GO

CREATE TABLE sysutility_ucp_managed_cluster_servers (
    cluster_id int NOT NULL,
    virtual_server_name sysname NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED,
    instance_name sysname NULL,
    server_name AS virtual_server_name + ISNULL('\' + NULLIF(instance_name,'MSSQLSERVER'),'')
)
GO

INSERT INTO sysutility_ucp_managed_cluster_nodes (cluster_id, node_name)
VALUES	(1,'PHYSICAL1'),
        (1,'PHYSICAL2'),
        (2,'PHYSICAL3'),
        (2,'PHYSICAL4')
GO

INSERT INTO sysutility_ucp_managed_cluster_servers (cluster_id, virtual_server_name, instance_name)
VALUES	(1,'VIRTUAL1','INST01'),
        (1,'VIRTUAL2','INST02'),
        (2,'VIRTUAL3','INST03')

GO

GRANT SELECT ON object::sysutility_ucp_managed_cluster_nodes TO [dc_proxy];
GRANT SELECT ON object::sysutility_ucp_managed_cluster_servers TO [dc_proxy];

Then we need to update the data sources collected using the cluster node name instead of the virtual name:

USE [sysutility_mdw]
GO

UPDATE trg
SET trg.instance_name = REPLACE(trg.instance_name COLLATE database_default, nodes.node_name + '\', srv.virtual_server_name + '\')
FROM [core].[source_info_internal] AS trg
INNER JOIN msdb.dbo.sysutility_ucp_managed_cluster_nodes AS nodes
    ON nodes.node_name = SUBSTRING(trg.instance_name, 1, LEN(nodes.node_name)) COLLATE database_default
INNER JOIN msdb.dbo.sysutility_ucp_managed_cluster_servers AS srv
    ON nodes.cluster_id = srv.cluster_id

-- Now server names should be ok
SELECT *
FROM sysutility_mdw.[core].[source_info_internal]
GO

Now we will replace the data sources table with a view that multiplies virtual server names for each possible owner node. This is required because the collection sets keep trying to upload data using the cluster node name and they fail miserably when the data source is not found in the table (“the specified collection set is not valid in this data warehouse”)

USE [sysutility_mdw]
GO

-- Rename the data sources table
EXEC sp_rename 'core.source_info_internal', 'source_info_internal_ms'

USE [sysutility_mdw]
GO

SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO

SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO

CREATE VIEW [core].[source_info_internal]
AS
SELECT sii.source_id
    ,sii.collection_set_uid
    ,instance_name = (nds.node_name + ISNULL('\' + NULLIF(srv.instance_name,'MSSQLSERVER'),'')) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AI
    ,sii.days_until_expiration
    ,sii.operator
FROM core.source_info_internal_ms AS sii
INNER JOIN msdb.dbo.sysutility_ucp_managed_cluster_servers AS srv
    ON sii.instance_name COLLATE database_default = srv.server_name
INNER JOIN msdb.dbo.sysutility_ucp_managed_cluster_nodes AS nds
    ON nds.cluster_id = srv.cluster_id
UNION ALL
SELECT *
FROM core.source_info_internal_ms

GO

And now the last thing we need to create is a trigger on the view, in order to control what gets written to the original table.
With this in place, we should have only “good” server names showing up in the instance_name column.

CREATE TRIGGER [core].[TR_source_info_internal_IU]
ON [core].[source_info_internal]
INSTEAD OF INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE
AS
BEGIN
    SET NOCOUNT ON;

    -- Update rows using the source_id
    UPDATE trg
    SET days_until_expiration = i.days_until_expiration
    FROM core.source_info_internal_ms AS trg
    INNER JOIN inserted AS i
        ON trg.source_id = i.source_id
    WHERE EXISTS (
        SELECT 1
        FROM deleted
        WHERE source_id = i.source_id
    )

    -- Turn INSERTs into UPDATEs using the
    -- cluster physical / virtual conversion
    UPDATE trg
    SET days_until_expiration = i.days_until_expiration
    FROM core.source_info_internal_ms AS trg
    INNER JOIN msdb.dbo.sysutility_ucp_managed_cluster_servers AS srv
        ON srv.server_name = trg.instance_name COLLATE database_default
    INNER JOIN msdb.dbo.sysutility_ucp_managed_cluster_nodes AS nodes
        ON nodes.cluster_id = srv.cluster_id
    INNER JOIN inserted AS i
        ON  trg.collection_set_uid = i.collection_set_uid
        AND trg.operator = i.operator
        AND nodes.node_name + ISNULL('\' + NULLIF(srv.instance_name,'MSSQLSERVER'),'') = i.instance_name COLLATE database_default
    WHERE NOT EXISTS (
        SELECT 1
        FROM deleted
        WHERE source_id = i.source_id
    )

    -- Handle proper INSERTs
    ;WITH newrows AS (
        SELECT collection_set_uid, v_server.instance_name, days_until_expiration, operator
        FROM inserted AS i
        CROSS APPLY (
            SELECT instance_name = COALESCE((
                    SELECT srv.server_name
                    FROM msdb.dbo.sysutility_ucp_managed_cluster_servers AS srv
                    INNER JOIN msdb.dbo.sysutility_ucp_managed_cluster_nodes AS nodes
                        ON nodes.cluster_id = srv.cluster_id
                    WHERE srv.server_name = i.instance_name COLLATE database_default
                ),(
                    SELECT srv.server_name
                    FROM msdb.dbo.sysutility_ucp_managed_cluster_servers AS srv
                    INNER JOIN msdb.dbo.sysutility_ucp_managed_cluster_nodes AS nodes
                        ON nodes.cluster_id = srv.cluster_id
                    WHERE nodes.node_name + ISNULL('\' + NULLIF(srv.instance_name,'MSSQLSERVER'),'') = i.instance_name COLLATE database_default
                ), (
                    SELECT i.instance_name COLLATE database_default
                )
            ) -- end coalesce
        ) AS v_server
        WHERE NOT EXISTS (
                SELECT 1
                FROM deleted
                WHERE source_id = i.source_id
            )
    )
    INSERT INTO core.source_info_internal_ms (collection_set_uid, instance_name, days_until_expiration, operator)
    SELECT collection_set_uid, instance_name, days_until_expiration, operator
    FROM newrows
    WHERE NOT EXISTS (
        SELECT 1
        FROM core.source_info_internal_ms
        WHERE collection_set_uid = newrows.collection_set_uid
            AND instance_name = newrows.instance_name
            AND operator = newrows.operator
    )

    DELETE trg
    FROM core.source_info_internal_ms AS trg
    WHERE EXISTS (
            SELECT 1
            FROM deleted
            WHERE source_id = trg.source_id
        )
        AND NOT EXISTS (
            SELECT 1
            FROM inserted
            WHERE source_id = trg.source_id
        )

END

Obviously I don’t have access to the source code of the Data Collector, but I suspect it uses a component which is not cluster-aware (dcexec.exe) and for some reason it ends up using the wrong IP address to communicate with the management datawarehouse. I have nothing to support my supposition: it only seems reasonable to me and it resembles something I experienced in the past with non-cluster-aware services, such as the SQL Browser.

Is this a bug? Definitely!

Should I report it on Connect? Maybe: the results with past items are so discouraging that I don’t think I’ll bother taking the time to file it. It must be said that reproducing this error is not easy: any other failover cluster instance I have laying around was not affected by this issue, so I guess it’s an edge case. Nevertheless, worth fixing.

 

UPDATE 15 sept 2016:

Turns out that the whole problem arises ONLY when a proxy account runs the data collection job steps. If the job steps are run impersonating the SQL Server Agent account, the error doesn’t turn up. I suggest this solution rather than the complicated view/trigger solution proposed here.

Advertisements

Posted on March 19, 2013, in SQL Server and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 8 Comments.

  1. Thanks, finaly it works 🙂

    • Sorry, I didn’t update the post after resolving the issue with Microsoft some time ago. Turns out that the whole problem arises ONLY when a proxy account runs the data collection job steps. If the job steps are run impersonating the SQL Server Agent account, the error doesn’t turn up. I suggest this solution rather than the complicated view/trigger solution proposed here.

      • THANKS!

        This one has been driving me crazy in testing. I was about to give up on going to PROD with this as the reporting on a multi-node cluster would have been suspect.

        Like you, I was sure the tokens were the cause and DCEXEC changed handling of them – nope.

        Seriously – the proxy. WOW

  1. Pingback: The big disconnect with Connect | spaghettidba

  2. Pingback: The big disconnect with Connect | spaghettidba

  3. Pingback: The big disconnect with Connect | blog1

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: