Blog Archives

Error upgrading MDW from 2008R2 to 2012


Some months ago I posted a method to overcome some quirks in the MDW database in a clustered environment.

Today I tried to upgrade that clustered instance (in a test environment, fortunately) and I got some really annoying errors.

Actually, I got what I deserved for messing with the system databases and I wouldn’t even dare posting my experience if  it wasn’t cause by something I suggested on this blog.

However, every cloud has a silver lining: many things can go wrong when upgrading a cluster and the resolution I will describe here can fit many failed upgrade situations.

So, what’s wrong with the solution I proposed back in march?

The offending line in that code is the following:

EXEC sp_rename 'core.source_info_internal', 'source_info_internal_ms'

What happened here? Basically, I renamed a table in the MDW and I created a view in its place.

One of the steps of the setup process tries to upgrade the MDW database with a script, that is executed at the first startup on an upgraded cluster node.

The script fails and the following message is found in the ERRORLOG:

Creating table [core].[source_info_internal]...
2013-10-24 09:21:02.99 spid8s Error: 2714, Severity: 16, State: 6.
2013-10-24 09:21:02.99 spid8s There is already an object named 'source_info_internal' in the database.
2013-10-24 09:21:02.99 spid8s Error: 912, Severity: 21, State: 2.
2013-10-24 09:21:02.99 spid8s Script level upgrade for database 'master' failed because upgrade step 'upgrade_ucp_cmdw.sql' encountered error 3602, state 51, severity 25. This is a serious error condition which might interfere with regular operation and the database will be taken offline. If the error happened during upgrade of the 'master' database, it will prevent the entire SQL Server instance from starting. Examine the previous errorlog entries for errors, take the appropriate corrective actions and re-start the database so that the script upgrade steps run to completion.
2013-10-24 09:21:02.99 spid8s Error: 3417, Severity: 21, State: 3.
2013-10-24 09:21:02.99 spid8s Cannot recover the master database. SQL Server is unable to run. Restore master from a full backup, repair it, or rebuild it. For more information about how to rebuild the master database, see SQL Server Books Online.

Every attempt to bring the SQL Server resource online results in a similar error message.

The only way to fix the error is to restore the initial state of the MDW database, renaming the table core.source_info_internal_ms to its original name.

But how can it be done, since the instance refuses to start?

Microsoft added and documented trace flag 902, that can be used to bypass the upgrade scripts at instance startup.

Remember that the startup parameters of a clustered instance cannot be modified while the resource is offline, because the registry checkpointing mechanism will restore the registry values stored in the quorum disk while bringing the resource online.

There are three ways to start the instance in this situation:

  1. modify the startup parameters by disabling checkpointing
  2. modify the startup parameters in the quorum registry hives
  3. start the instance manually at the command prompt

Method N.3 is the simplest one in this situation and is what I ended up doing.

Once the instance started, I renamed the view core.source_info_internal and renamed core.source_info_internal_ms to its original name.

The instance could then be stopped (CTRL+C at the command prompt or SHUTDOWN WITH NOWAIT in sqlcmd) and restarted removing the trace flag.

With the MDW in its correct state, the upgrade scripts completed without errors and the clustered instance could be upgraded to SQL Server 2012 without issues.

Lessons learned:

  1. Never, ever mess with the system databases. The MDW is not technically a system database, but it’s shipped by Microsoft and should be kept untouched. If you decide you absolutely need to modify something there, remember to undo your changes before upgrading and applying service packs.
  2. Always test your environment before upgrading. It took me 1 hour to fix the issue and not every upgrade scenario tolerates 1 hour of downtime. Think about it.
  3. Test your upgrade.
  4. Did I mention you need to test?

Jokes aside, I caught my error in a test environment and I’m happy it was not in production.

As the saying goes, better safe than sorry.

Using QUERYTRACEON in plan guides


Yesterday the CSS team made the QUERYTRACEON hint publicly documented.

This means that now it’s officially supported and you can use it in production code.

After reading the post on the CSS blog, I started to wonder whether there is some actual use in production for this query hint, given that it requires the same privileges as DBCC TRACEON, which means you have to be a member of the sysadmin role.

In fact, if you try to use that hint when connected as a low privileged user, you get a very precise error message, that leaves no room for interpretation:

SELECT *
FROM [AdventureWorks2012].[Person].[Person]
OPTION (QUERYTRACEON 4199)

Msg 2571, Level 14, State 3, Line 1
User ‘guest’ does not have permission to run DBCC TRACEON.

How can a query hint available to sysadmins only be possibly useful for production?

I posted my doubt on Twitter using the #sqlhelp hashtag and got interesting replies from Paul Randal, Paul White and Robert Davis.

My concerns were not about the usefulness of the hint per se, but about the usefulness in production code. Often 140 chars are not enough when you want to express your thoughts clearly, in fact I decided to write this blog post to clarify what I mean.

As we have seen, the QUERYTRACEON query hint cannot be used directly by users not in the sysadmin role, but it can be used in stored procedures with “EXECUTE AS owner” and in plan guides.

While it’s completely clear what happens when the hint is used in procedures executed in the context of the owner, what happens in plan guides is not so obvious (at least, not to me). In fact, given that the secuirty context is not changed when the plan guide is matched and applied, I would have expected it to fail miserably when executed by a low privileged user, but it’s not the case.

Let’s try and see what happens:

First of all we need a query “complex enough” to let the optimizer take plan guides into account. A straight “SELECT * FROM table” and anything else that results in a trivial plan won’t be enough.

SELECT *
FROM [Person].[Person] AS P
INNER JOIN [Person].[PersonPhone] AS H
    ON P.BusinessEntityID = H.BusinessEntityID
INNER JOIN [Person].[BusinessEntity] AS BE
    ON P.BusinessEntityID = BE.BusinessEntityID
INNER JOIN [Person].[BusinessEntityAddress] AS BEA
    ON BE.BusinessEntityID = BEA.BusinessEntityID
WHERE BEA.ModifiedDate > '20080101'

Then we need a plan guide to apply the QUERYTRACEON hint:

EXEC sp_create_plan_guide @name = N'[querytraceon]', @stmt = N'SELECT *
FROM [Person].[Person] AS P
INNER JOIN [Person].[PersonPhone] AS H
	ON P.BusinessEntityID = H.BusinessEntityID
INNER JOIN [Person].[BusinessEntity] AS BE
	ON P.BusinessEntityID = BE.BusinessEntityID
INNER JOIN [Person].[BusinessEntityAddress] AS BEA
	ON BE.BusinessEntityID = BEA.BusinessEntityID
WHERE BEA.ModifiedDate > ''20080101''', @type = N'SQL', @hints = N'OPTION (QUERYTRACEON 4199)'

If we enable the plan guide and try to issue this query in the context of a low privileged user, we can see no errors thrown any more:

CREATE LOGIN testlogin WITH PASSWORD = 'testlogin123';
GO
USE AdventureWorks2012;
GO
CREATE USER testlogin FOR LOGIN testlogin;
GO
GRANT SELECT TO testlogin;
GO
EXECUTE AS USER = 'testlogin';
GO
SELECT *
FROM [Person].[Person] AS P
INNER JOIN [Person].[PersonPhone] AS H
    ON P.BusinessEntityID = H.BusinessEntityID
INNER JOIN [Person].[BusinessEntity] AS BE
    ON P.BusinessEntityID = BE.BusinessEntityID
INNER JOIN [Person].[BusinessEntityAddress] AS BEA
    ON BE.BusinessEntityID = BEA.BusinessEntityID
WHERE BEA.ModifiedDate > '20080101';
GO
REVERT;
GO

If we open a profiler trace and capture the “Plan Guide Successful” and “Plan Guide Unsuccessful” events, we can see that the optimizer matches the plan guide and enforces the use of the query hint.

Lesson learned: even if  users are not allowed to issue that particular query hint directly, adding it to a plan guide is a way to let anyone use it indirectly.

Bottom line is OPTION QUERYTRACEON can indeed be very useful when we identify some queries that obtain a decent query plan only when a specific trace flag is active and we don’t want to enable it for the whole instance. In those cases, a plan guide or a stored procedure in the owner’s context can be the answer.

Changing Server Collation


In order to avoid collation conflict issues with TempDB, all user databases on a SQL Server instance should be set to the same collation.

Temporary tables and table variables are stored in TempDB, that means that, unless explicitly defined, all character-based columns are created using the database collation, which is the same of the master database. If user databases have a different collation, joining physical tables to temporary tables may cause a collation conflict.

For instance you could have a user database with collation SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS on a server with collation Latin1_General_CI_AS:

SELECT  name,
        collation_name,
        is_system =
        CASE
            WHEN name IN ('master', 'model', 'tempdb', 'msdb') THEN 1
            ELSE 0
        END
FROM    sys.databases
ORDER BY is_system DESC, name ASC


Every time you create a temporary table and join it to a permanent table in this database, you have to ensure that the collations match, or you will run into a collation conflict:

USE dblocal
GO

CREATE TABLE TestTable (
    testColumn varchar(10)
)

INSERT INTO TestTable VALUES ('conflict')

CREATE TABLE #TempTable (
    tempColumn varchar(10)
)

INSERT INTO #TempTable VALUES ('conflict')

SELECT *
FROM TestTable
INNER JOIN #TempTable
    ON testColumn = tempColumn

The only ways to avoid the conflict are:

  • Define explicitly the collation on the temporary table with a collation name or database_default
  • Add the COLLATE clause to the join predicate, using a collation name or database_default
-- OPTION 1: define the collation when creating the table
CREATE TABLE #TempTable (
    tempColumn varchar(10) COLLATE database_default
)

-- OPTION 2: force a specific collation when querying the table
SELECT *
FROM TestTable
INNER JOIN #TempTable
    ON testColumn = tempColumn COLLATE database_default

The first option must be preferred when possible, because it doesn’t need performing scalar calculations that end up making any index referencing the column virtually useless.

However, both methods require editing the code, which is not always possible. In those cases, changing the server collation is the only possible solution.

In the SQL Server 2000 days, there was a “nice” tool called rebuildm, that recreated the master database and could achieve this task simply. From SQL Server 2005 on, the only tool to rebuild system databases is the setup utility.

This is what Microsoft recommends to rebuild system databases: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms179254.aspx

Setup /QUIET /ACTION=REBUILDDATABASE /INSTANCENAME=InstanceName
/SQLSYSADMINACCOUNTS=accounts /[ SAPWD= StrongPassword ]
/SQLCOLLATION=CollationName

Be warned that blogs and forums are filled with bad advice on this topic. The most frequent ones are these:

  1. Change the collation of the model database
    TempDB is created from model when the service starts, which makes this method look smart. It’s not! Changing the database collation for model doesn’t change the collation of the objects inside the database: you would end up with a messy template for every new database.
  2. Copy the model database from another instance with the desired collation.
    It could work, given that you copy the database from an instance with the exact same @@version. Even if you managed to copy the database, tempdb would have a collation other than those of master and msdb, which would mean moving the original problem among the system databases. Believe me, this is not what you want.

The recommended method requires running the setup and usually is not a big deal. This blog on MSDN (CSS Support Engineers) describes in depth how the setup works and how to troubleshoot some common issues: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/psssql/archive/2008/08/29/how-to-rebuild-system-databases-in-sql-server-2008.aspx

An undocumented method

There seems to be another undocumented method, mentioned (and advertised as safe) by Paul Randal (blog | twitter) in one of his presentations: http://devconnections.com/updates/LasVegas_Fall10/SQL/Randal-SQL-SDB407-Undocumented.pdf (page 17). The method relies on a startup parameter that allows changing the server collation when combined with a couple of trace flags:

 sqlservr -m -T4022 -T3659 -q"new collation" 

Trace flag 3659 allows logging all errors to sql server logs
Trace flag 4022 forces SQL Server to skip startup stored procedures (if you have any).
Startup option “-m” forces single user mode.
Startup option “-q” rebuilds all databases and contained objects into the specified collation, without reinstalling the instance.

Besides being undocumented, this method seems to have some pitfalls. Gail Shaw (blog | twitter) raises a couple of warnings on this thread at SqlServerCentral: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic269173-146-1.aspx

So, why recommend a method that could fail or cause harm to your instance? There is a scenario where this method comes extremely handy, mainly because the documented and supported method fails, which is a big SQL Server 2005 cluster.

One of the biggest innovations in SQL Server 2008 setup concerned the cluster installation: in SQL Server 2005 the setup process was run against all passive nodes and then against the active node for the instance, while SQL Server 2008 setup runs only against the local machine and has to be repeated for each node in the cluster.

Running the setup on all the passive nodes, as SQL Server 2005 setup does, can be a pain in the rear. The more nodes you have, more things can go wrong.

Despite all my efforts, I was unable to run the setup successfully with rebuild database action on a SQL Server 2005 cluster. The log files did not report anything useful for troubleshooting: they were only saying that one of the passive nodes could not complete the setup. I was ready to uninstall the instance and install from scratch when I came across the undocumented –q parameter. I tried (I had nothing to lose, after all) and it worked.

I hope it can work for you too.